On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:08 AM, <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Yep.  Can there be any other reason for them dropping Mac and Unix support
> other than them not wanting apps for non-Windows systems (to keep the
> Windows dominance)?
>

"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence."

Believing your enemy (or opponent, or vendor) is just pure evil incarnate
puts you at the disadvantage. And I don't really think incompetence was the
issue, either, it's just such a pithy quote. The corporation that created
the largest number of millionaires ever had some things going for it. But
their motivations were likely far different from ours or from the Fox
Software folks.

I think that sales of VFP Mac were abysmal. The 3.0 version of the product
was painfully slow and buggy, too. I don't have any idea what the sales of
the UNIX product were, but I'll bet the Windows-centric MS had a lot of
concerns about marketing and supporting a Unix product.

I know there was an effort to move VFP from its existing C compiler to the
MS compiler. Porting three platforms isn't three times harder; it's likely
more like nine or twenty-seven times harder. You couldn't optimize in x86
assembler, since Mac's were 68k based at the time, and Unix ran on all
sorts of scary things like PowerPC and MIPs CPUs. There had to be all sorts
of issues with memory-management, video compatibility, etc. This is a huge
software engineering task, and MS had to look at this in a cost-justifying
business case. Why would they want to do this? I don't think the math was
that hard.

As I've said before, MS bought  Fox for some very specific reasons, which
they are unlikely to ever blatently state in public, but it's very likely
those motives involved competition, Borland, Ashton-Tate, and talent
acquisition far more than whether or not VFP ran on the latest Macintosh..



-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4sh=sz0c6lg6vnarfalamqsitjhb8zxe1pyr4+yjqm...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to