On 11 Jun 2014 16:57, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Paul Hill had mentioned something about the Code Pages and/or encoding. I figured that happens to data behind the scenes, not necessarily if an end-user is touching it. ???
It was just an idea. If your 'language for non Unicode programs' is not the same as your dbf setting (see CpDbf()) then fox could convert it into the current codepage. There was a Spanish ñ in your example. I'm pretty sure Polish or Russian doesn't have this. Just something to be aware of. > > > > On 2014-06-11 11:47, Richard Kaye wrote: >> >> If the users never directly interact with the value why would that be a concern? >> >> -- >> >> rk >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:42 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Interesting GOTCHA from 16-byte binary key >> >> LOL...so back to the remaining question: do you think that non-USA >> users might encounter issues if I'm using the binary instead of the >> unicode or ansi human readable options? Here they are again from >> VFP2C32's help: >> >> * 0 = ansi human readable (38 wide) >> * 1 = unicode (76 wide) >> * 2 = binary (16 wide) >> >> tia, >> --Mike >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CADwx0+JW26c1CMLDHyxzHFKjAq3=ys4UDHAUJjP7Bn=q6wr...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
