Yes, I do use CDO since I use my Gmail account to send emails
I have not experienced any issues with this.
The most recent issue I had with it was >6 months ago when Gmail insisted I
use the full "[email protected]" as the user name. Before that, "someone"
was sufficient




On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:39 PM, <
[email protected]> wrote:

> This is CDO called from VFP.  Sytze?  Somebody here turned me onto CDO.
>  Gotta check my notes.
>
>
>
> On 2014-07-27 22:22, M Jarvis wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 6:54 PM, <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  My CDO email code seems to have gone 'tits up' as my UK brothers say.  My
>>> email account uses TLS, so Blat isn't an option.  I do recall some
>>> alternative that was mentioned in the archives and I'm going to check
>>> that
>>> out, but I wanted to reach out to the developers using CDO successfully
>>> now.  Did you have to change your code recently?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>  How recently are we talking about?
>>
>> For internal use (status reports, helpbox stuff, etc) I use CDO via an ASP
>> interface bouncing off an Exchange server all the time and as of late Fri
>> afternoon as far as I know everything was fine...
>>
>> --
>> Matt Jarvis
>> Eugene, Oregon USA
>>
>>
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>> multipart/alternative
>>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>   text/html
>> ---
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAG1nNy_p=B=_puernfmfnmzyjk6d_xvvezqjn295-gh9dgh...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to