On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Ricardo Aráoz <[email protected]> wrote:
> El 09/08/14 a las 22:21, Ted Roche escibió: > >> >> > LOL > Don't know much about your legislation but, doesn't it require that both > parties must "know" about the agreement before entering one? If the > "agreement" was inside the box then you had no way of knowing about it > until *after* you purchased it, so you wouldn't be bound by it. Well, there is the law, and there is reality. I bought it from an online vendor. That vendors terms of service may say, "You agree to be bound by the terms of whatever we sell." Would that be morally right? I don't think so. But if either *HUGE* company (Amazon or AT&T) decided it was worth fighting about, they have buildings full of lawyers they could throw at a case, while I had trouble scraping up $48 to buy their phone. I surely could not afford to spend the money to have the issue debated in court. So, if either of them decided to press the issue, I would probably knuckle under and buy their lousy service. I just have to depend on you guys not to tell anyone else... :) -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4spbs0fov7wepsrmwz+czhz-ynjosjfvkhjn9pi_q3...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
