On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:24 PM, < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 2014-08-26 14:16, Stephen Russell wrote: > >> I found out that one of my sites was like that and they increased the PW >> len. from 8 max to 16 or 24. Never told me, but when I did a switch last >> month is saw the new capability. >> > > > That Salt/Hash discussion I started here awhile back....why don't sites do > that kind/level of encryption for keeping passwords safe? Seems like a no > brainer to me. Obviously I'm missing something?? > -------------------- They do that after you supply text to them. They may have had a limit on how much text you could present??? Poor programming I'm sure. We are a bank so we know better! As a second possibility. Oh yeah that bank use to use foxpro back in the day I remember talking to someone who worked there back at the Halloween party back in the day. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJupJhbt_9M7MTf_DrDNgbAD7=c6se2bymwz03fvo9...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
