Thanks, Kevin! I'll check it out.

Mike

Kevin Cully wrote:
Let me chime in with an endorsement of Xojo. Free to try out development for Desktop, Web and soon for iOS native applications. Desktop allows for development on Windows, Mac and Linux. Web apps are great for consumption on phones and tablets. To compile and deploys stand-alone applications, you'll need a license. I find the licensing costs to be reasonable.

As far as the language goes, it is very much like VFP: Object oriented, single inheritance model. Did I mention it natively has threads?

I think most VFP developers could be comfortable within 2 days.

http://xojo.com

On 12/02/2014 05:53 PM, Mike Copeland wrote:
I'm in a similar situation now where I'm good with using VFP as a fat client for Windows desktops, but tablets and phones are becoming more and more desirable (and useful) for some of the tasks my fat-app does. (I hear the wolves at the door and realize I can't ignore them forever.) Thanks to others on this list I've also been making a serious effort towards Python, but I confess I like the fences that VFP provides (single IDE, lots of ways to do stuff, but a core VFP-way to do it.) While Python is obviously flexible and powerful, I feel like I'm standing in a huge open prairie with no idea which way to go.

Not looking for extensive reporting of your investigation prior to choosing B4Android, just a succinct sales pitch (besides the obvious price advantages!)


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to