The truly sad part is I remembered that you had offered a solution to that problem years ago when the question came in this time. I think I even have it saved in my local Profox archives. I thought about searching the archives but noticed that Tracy has come up with the same answer.
Nice sig in those old messages... ;-) -- rk -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 3:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Return Numbers from String On 01/16/2015 01:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Oh now that is slick...and not a RegExp either (and easy to > understand)!!! You 'da man, Tracy!!!! What was old is new again... http://leafe.com/archives/msg/231233 Hooray for the archives! - -- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cy1pr10mb021872a09e9f30710b7ae525d2...@cy1pr10mb0218.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
