Just don't do DBF read/write when using a UDF in a SQL statement, at least, not without opening the table using another alias.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > Doing away with a UDF for this case was what I was after. I'm not anti UDF. > I do use them elsewhere > Why do you say use a UDF? I don't need the pointer to remain in my case. -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you! _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJCvoVGSJKO7=+hp2v1ydtmbyxxqsoy9gatnpcmqejh...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
