It is the interactive development environment that I'm wanting to address.
I would like to have that environment give me access to any functions that
I have added to a general purpose library without any further action on my
part.  It would be nice if the system would let me get to the source
without needing to switch folders as well.

I think I used to add a set path statement to the config.fpw file.  At this
point I'm not sure if that is still a part of the system or where it would
need to be located.  Perhaps in the folder where VFP is opened?

Joe

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Fred Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do you have a SET PROCEDURE file active?  Functions can be found that way,
> too.  Also, if it;s an .EXE you're running, it will look internally for
> other files.  You may also have a SET PATH in your code.
>
> Fred
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Joe Yoder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I think I used to do this is a configuration file in FoxPro DOS.  I
> checked
> > the Config.fpw files I found on my system and none of them have a Path
> > statement even though my system is finding a function that is not in the
> > current directory.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any help,
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> > multipart/alternative
> >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >   text/html
> > ---
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CABQeDnWogr8D073KgtdzHk2XYd0rdP=t7pkxgk25hsb2kcq...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to