At 15:49 2015-02-02, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote:
On Feb 2, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> Total [OT] Posts: 13 >> (Up 100.0% from December 2014) > > For this to be so, there would have had to have been 6 1/2 OT posts in December. I have my doubts. I have a check for divide by zero, and the option to put either 100% or ∞%. I chose 100% because I know that many email readers might not properly display the infinity symbol. Does that make you happier? ;-)

Why not put "undefined", "There were none in December.", or just not report it? Wrong numbers are bad.

Your reply was garbled. This does not happen often, but it still happens. Have you ever figured out what does this?

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to