On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Alan Bourke <[email protected]> wrote: > No, you don't. Leave the caching alone. it's there for a reason. If > you're having to mess with caching on a regular basis, you need to be > looking at your program code.
All kinds of write caching is evil, in my conservative opinions.... :) > You *can't* turn off OpLocks under SMB2 and SMB3. You have to knock > everything back to SMB1 and then turn off OpLocks which to me is both > unnecessary and a bad idea. I didn't know that. I remember smb.conf had options for oplocks... https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/locking.html -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you! _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJCt=8_67G3Ltn24LX=ZXbZanp0rzY2Dh1iXuwXJf1Xo=g...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
