Well that's foxcode.. we all know that fox is far superior to any other language.. lol
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:34 AM, AndyHC <[email protected]> wrote: > Was the fwrite buffered??? > > On 28/03/2015 15:38, Laurie Alvey wrote: > >> Quite. I've just rewritten my test code using (1) >> REPLICATE(<char>,1000000) followed by STRTOFILE and (2) 1,000,000 >> sequential calls to FWRITE(<handle>, <char>). REPLICATE took 47 ms and >> FWRITE took 1.047 secs. >> >> Laurie >> >> >> > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capqlobzld+41wsq+jxkvhv1tztdf-0jrk7_z_hsorimtcte...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
