I had the same client hit with some Cryptlocker variant for at least the 3rd 
time yesterday. I don't understand why their IT director still has a  job.

--

rk
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 7:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Another new ransomware

Just had a customer hit with similar - mentioning 'decryptfiles.com' in the 
renamed file. 

Which looks like another CryptoLocker variant.


--
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

On Wed, 7 Oct 2015, at 11:54 AM, Michael Madigan wrote:
> A gazillion man hours wasted across the world and no punishment for 
> the perp.
>       From: Paul Hill <[email protected]>
>  To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]>
>  Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:52 AM
>  Subject: Another new ransomware
>    
> Hi All,
> 
> I found possible new ransomware at a site today.
> 
> There were many dbf files that had been renamed. For example:
> 
> HS_0WIN.DBF
> 
> was renamed to:
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> I tried renaming this file back but it was corrupt. Looking in the 
> file it seemed scrambled (probably encrypted?).
> 
> I found these all over the place.  Did not find a ransom note.
> I'm guessing 'hairullah' wants money to decrypt these.
> 
> Luckily this site had a backup only a few hours old.
> 
> --
> Paul
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/sn1pr10mb09289a9781b8ffc8d41b0994d2...@sn1pr10mb0928.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to