Actually, Brant, that's a great idea because it would make maintenance a lot easier. Printers do get shuffled (and renamed/reinstalled) from time to time without my knowledge and it would allow me to group workstations to a single printer. My prior thought was to store the default printer name in an INI file that my app uses to store the IP address for the data server. Doing it my way requires 150 (or at least a bunch) of system accesses and updates, along with future individual updates. Using a table I can define clusters, assign the workstation IP address to a cluster and assign a printer to a cluster. Kind of an abstraction layer. If a printer changes, then the only update is to update the name of the printer for the affected cluster.

Thanks for the brain cycles!

Mike

Brant E. Layton wrote:
Hi Mike,

A thought to help with the default printer issue.

Since you are making changes to work around the problem, maybe include this?

A new table containing the machine and correct default printer.

You could define a record for each computer when you find that there is a default printer set. Or, you may already have a record somewhere of the computers and the printer they 'should' be using.
|
Brant Layton|
|480.964.1316|
On 10/10/2015 3:07 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Re: VFP 9 SP2 Printing problem



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
 text/plain (text body -- kept)
 text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to