On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Kurt Wendt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew - for obvious reasons - I hesitate to respond to this thread. Since - 
> I'm not sure if your comments in regards to the #3 slot was either positive 
> or negative.

And yet,... still you did :)

Don't take it personally, Kurt. Email is a medium for fostering and
amplifying misunderstandings. I've found I can regularly get my nose
out of joint, especially if I attempt a joke the other doesn't
understand, or if he or she does the same with me. Sometimes I think
it's worse with the English or the Canadians, because we think they
speak the same language and don't make allowances.

> Sure - I do indeed like to participate in this forum - as I've been doing so 
> for around 6 or 7 years now. I've gotten to be friends with some of the folks 
> here - including drinking a few pints of beer w/Stephen!
>
> Enough said...
>
> -K-
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew 
> Stirling
> Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2016 3:21 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: ProFox List Statistics for 2015
>
> Review for the year:
> Just my thoughts, as a lurker.
>
> No 1 we are so, so lucky to have Ted as no 1, for a guy who's business is no 
> longer VFP that's fab.
>
> No2, that crept up on me, I will have to pay attention!
>
> No3,  he seems to like to reply to every post! Consultants generally give 
> advice!
>
> no4, Dave, retiring this year? Tom has a lot to live up to!
>
> Dear Stephen, after a lot of hassles now keeps us informed with regards of/to 
> Microsoft's new/better procedures! Good ideas to be considered. Thanks
>
> Lets drop down to 14, 17 & 19. Well thought out solutions to problems.
> They obviously spend their time constructively.
>
> Virgil!, a Foxpro guy who fell on hard times. While I do not necessarily 
> agree with his views, its good to see his ability to put them forward in a 
> constructive manor.
>
> *****
>
> Whos missing well Kristyne McDaniel as of 2009/01/09 for one!
>
> How comes we don't have any female contributors? well apart from no 9/15 
> Tracy/Laurie that is!
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andrew Stirling
> 01250 870397 / 874580
> 07910467915
> [email protected]
> http://www.calcpay.co.uk
>
> On 01/01/2016 07:13, List Administrator Account wrote:
>> ==================================================
>> ProFox List Statistics
>> 2015
>
>>
>> Top 20 Contributors by Number of Non-OT Posts
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> |    Posts   Contributor                       |
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>    1.  388    Ted Roche
>>    2.  375    Alan Bourke
>>    3.  360    Kurt Wendt
>>    4.  255    Dave Crozier
>>    5.  250    Stephen Russell
>>    6.  173    [email protected]
>>    7.  168    Richard Kaye
>>    8.  160    Jeff Johnson
>>    9.  156    Tracy Pearson
>>   10.  130    Allen
>>   11.  129    Ken Dibble
>>   12.  126    Gene Wirchenko
>>   13.  103    Man-wai Chang
>>   14.   98    Fernando D. Bozzo
>>   15.   87    Laurie Alvey
>>   16.   76    Mike Copeland
>>   17.   73    Kevin Cully
>>   18.   72    AndyHC
>>   19.   71    Fred Taylor
>>   20.   68    Virgil Bierschwale
>>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4swog8eu7wveqdhvu-fkx4b+_rdhkjtsrjgdpkxw9b...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to