On January 26, 2016 4:19:38 AM EST, Paul Hill <[email protected]> wrote: >On 25 January 2016 at 22:48, Tracy Pearson <[email protected]> >wrote: >> [email protected] wrote on 2016-01-25: >>> Comodo should really stop selling the SHA-1 and SHA-2 if they're >>> problematic in today's computing world. >> >> Mike, >> >> The SHA-2 is the current standard. >> Windows XP and Vista probably won't be able to use the SHA-2 to >verify the >> certificate. >> I started a new thread that has a link which shows how to dual sign >with >> both SHA-1 and SHA-2 (which is also known as SHA-256). This will help >with >> verifying on multiple OS's and still only ship 1 EXE. > >Thanks Tracy, I was not aware of that. > >There seems to be a lot of Comodo resellers out there. Does it matter >which one I use? >Prices seem to vary quite a bit!
Paul, I would say, find the best price selling the Comodo code signing certificate and use K Software since they have a price beat guarantee. Comodo is giving the SHA-1 certificate with the purchase of the SHA-2. I'm sure buying through any reseller will be the same. Having the SHA-1 currently, to get our SHA-2 we just need to go through the reseller. Comodo still sends us the certificate direct. Tracy -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
