FWIW here's Rick Strahl's commentary on the .Net Core release.

http://weblog.west-wind.com/posts/2016/Jan/21/Microsoft-renames-ASPNET-5-to-ASPNET-Core-10

--

rk

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 9:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NF] Why OpenSource .NET?

Ed,

It is under the MIT License according to this.

https://github.com/dotnet/corefx

It is worth noting that .NET Core != the .NET Framework. It is just essentially 
at the moment (as far as I can tell) a FOSS implementation of the Common 
Language Runtime. 


--
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bn4pr10mb091398e6fd140bf29f40b69ed2...@bn4pr10mb0913.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to