Yes - it really must have been a focus issue. And, now - Its not having the problem of being way slow - it actually seems to be working. So - luckily - it looks like I may have a viable Multi-Select Grid functioning. Hooray!
-K- -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Darren Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 5:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Multi-Select Grid & Foxite Code Issue (Was...RE: A Question of ListBoxes) Might be to do with focus. >From Help: The ActiveRow property does not return the same value as RECNO( ) in an indexed table. ActiveRow returns zero if the grid doesn't have the focus or when you access a row outside the grid display. -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt Sent: Saturday, 30 January 2016 9:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Multi-Select Grid & Foxite Code Issue (Was...RE: A Question of ListBoxes) OK - strangely enough - when I was trying to review the issues and stepping thru the Method where the main processing takes place - that ActiveRow kept showing as Zero. But, now, in that Method - I simply put in a Wait statement and have it report what the ActiveRow - and now its showing a proper record # value. Very strange... -K- -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 5:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Multi-Select Grid & Foxite Code Issue (Was...RE: A Question of ListBoxes) Hey Ted, Thanks for "Getting That For me". So - yes, I decided to go the Grid route on this issue. I did look at the 1001/Ch 6 - but, in the webpage it refers to using sample code that came with the book. However, I saw one of the links above it - from Foxite. I decided to implement that code. To be honest - I hadn't sub-classed before, but, I figured it out and made a Grid sub-class. However, I'm having a problem in implementing the code. I implemented everything as stated on this webpage: https://www.foxite.com/faq/default.aspx?id=3# I believe I implemented all the code correctly. However, I'm having a problem with the following lines: WITH THIS .nActiveRow = IIF(.ACTIVEROW = 0, .nActiveRow ,.ACTIVEROW) && Assign value to class property Originally the 2nd line above was as follows: .nActiveRow =.ACTIVEROW && Assign value to class property The problem is - value in ACTIVEROW is Always Zero (a property in the Grid ). I have NO Idea why its always Zero. In theory - if I change to another record - it should be giving the record #. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Kurt -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 4:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: A Question of ListBoxes... On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Kurt Wendt <[email protected]> wrote: > > To a certain extent - I agree. If they want a Grid - maybe I should > give them one. That being said - I don't think there is a straightforward way in a Grid to Select Multiple items. Am I wrong? Although - After writing the last 2 sentences - some ideas were rolling around in my head about implementing a multi-select in a Grid. Since, at least with me - I know anything is possible - as I've done some interesting screen designs in the past! > Forgive me, but the answer is obviously: http://bfy.tw/3yWI and again, I recommend 1001, Chapter 6 this time. -- Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f26a...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
