Except that it makes enormous files and also sometimes locks up for no
reason. It's good, but a long way from great.

-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Wiedeman
Sent: Friday, 26 February 2016 10:44 AM
To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NF] Best format(s) to publish old PPT slides to the web

Sorry if this has been mentioned but the newer versions of PowerPoint make
it pretty easy to convert a PowerPoint to a video that can be uploaded to
YouTube. You can then embed the YouTube video in your web site.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crozier [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 9:22 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [NF] Best format(s) to publish old PPT slides to the web

Ted,
All I get after the redirect is a black screen both on Firefox and Google
Chrome and Internet Explorer 11 just refuses to connect at all!

That's progress folks!

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: 25 February 2016 15:29
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NF] Best format(s) to publish old PPT slides to the web

Not Fox, but kinda Fox.

Google has started complaining about some of the older pages on my web site,
which are *ancient* (1997, 98, 99) converted PPT files which MS Office
helpfully converted into "state of the art" web pages that Google has
decided it can no longer parse, and throws what they call "soft 404" pages:
framed web pages that internally redirect, or non-standard HTML it will no
longer parse.

So, I'd like to open these files up and re-publish them, as a historical
archive, not necessarily of any great value. The slides are pretty much curt
outlines, where the questions are presented, but the answers were usually at
the talk, and hopefully in the associated white paper. So, yeah, mixed
feelings. Folks who saw the presentations might grin at seeing the old retro
slides with funky themes.

I would like to:
-- publish the stuff on my website, so don't bother recommending Slideshare.
-- preserve the graphical presentation, ideally in a responsive format (big
on big screens, small on small screens) with simple (cursor
keys?) and accessible navigation.
-- offer a simple alternative view as text outline, likely one not-that-long
page.
-- valid HTML/CSS/JS of course.

Here's an example: my 1998 presentation on HTML Help was converted by
"Internet Assistant for Microsoft PowerPoint 97"

view-source:http://www.tedroche.com/Present/1998/Dev-14/sld013.htm

and makes pretty atrocious HTML (hey, it was 20 years ago, I did too!)

the "main page" is http://www.tedroche.com/Present/1998/HTMLHelp.htm
but that redirects to

http://www.tedroche.com/Present/1998/HTMLHelp_files/error.htm

with the laughably arrogant error message,

"This presentation contains content that your browser may not be able to
show properly. This presentation was optimized for more recent versions of
Microsoft Internet Explorer.

If you would like to proceed anyway, click here."

Considering this was generated with PowerPoint 97 and I'm looking at it in
Google Chromium 46, you gotta chuckle.

I thought I could do this in LibreOffice, as it has a nice Web export
wizard, but I'm getting a bizarre I/O error exporting media. I'll try to
debug that Python wizard in parallel, but would welcome suggestions if
anyone else has tried to do something like this.



--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to