I'm sorry, this is Visual FoxPro and I *assumed* through lack of
evidence to the contrary, that you were using *Visual* classes. It was
a poor assumption, since I have followed your postings here for a
decade or two, and now I recall you're a PRG-class guy, but keeping
track of how everyone here chooses to code, which frameworks they use
(or insist they don't need) is a bit tiresome.

I could ask nineteen more questions, but...

The fact that you included "subclassed" in your title indicates you
feel that is important. I should be able to read between the lines and
interpret why you emphasize that.

Visual classes was my first guess.

My second would be that "the code that isn't running" is inside of a
container, and it was the entire *container* that was subclassed and
not just the object whose code isn't running. Drew Speedie wrote up an
excellent article nearly 20 years ago on the problems with subclassing
containers, which Steven Black references here:

http://stevenblack.com/articles/managing-vfp-class-libraries/

I'm not having luck finding the original article online. Drew also
included it in the notes in his Visual Maxframe framework, and may
have published it as speaker notes from a conference or two.

If this sounds like it might be applicable, and you can't find the
article, contact me off-list and I'll help you find one.

If not, I've got eighteen more guesses...

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>      Ah, no.  I have subclassed.  The subclass code is not running.  It does
> in other forms.
>

It does in other forms when it is subclassed, or the code runs in
other forms, but doesn't run when it is subclassed?

Oh, darn! Now I'm down to seventeen questions!

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4t0kZ1n-6EGE3FRSeTh--KsAgWWDZ=V=oao9g3qigr...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to