Using the error log generated by FB2P it was pretty easy to identify the 
potential set of duplicate rows. I got rid of the oldest ones as suggested and 
the CV2 now generates. Thanks again, Darren, and kudos to Fernando!

--

rk
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 11:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FoxBin2Prg conversion error question

Thanks! Very useful info!

--

rk
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Darren
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 10:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FoxBin2Prg conversion error question

Easy enough to figure which are correct records.

First row of VCX ignore it.

2nd row on:

First row of class identified as:

        Not empty -     class, classloc, baseclass, objname 
        Empty -         parent

        Resevred2 will have a numeric value which is number of rows that go
to make up the class definition.

Last row of class definition will have empty - class, classloc, baseclass
and parent.  The objname of last record for class will be same as objname
for first record.

 Rows between first and last will have the Parent value populated with the
Objname of the parent which of course should be within the group of records
for the class definition.

Based on that you should be able to find any rogue records.


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bn4pr10mb091380d6d9c9158ca25a4261d2...@bn4pr10mb0913.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to