that's "now playing with"
John
On 08/16/2016 09:08 AM, John R. Sowden wrote:
Thanks. I read the pdf only to find that he referenced a hash method
that I am using (salted 2007 without going farther on an open forum).
Unfortunately, the .fll file is compiled and I cannot see the source
code to determine if it is using visual foxpro only code, or functions
that are available in fpdos 2.6. This is what I use so I can run under
ubuntu/dosemu or my true dos partitions. When I bought vpf 5.0 years
ago, there was a 'not enough ram' error that friends were also
having. It had something to do with the fact that I had excessing ram
and vfp calced the ram to not enough. I was unable to find a solution
and vfp did not seem to run reliably under linux/wine do I stayed with
dos. I am no praying with gambas and pure basic,
John
On 08/15/2016 11:49 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
http://doughennig.com/papers/Pub/201103dhen.pdf
downloadable here:
http://www.sweetpotatosoftware.com/spsblog/2005/09/01/VisualFoxProEncryptAndDecryptFiles.aspx
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:20 PM, John R. Sowden
<[email protected]> wrote:
I am currently using some code that I acquired years ago to hash (1 way
encrypt) passwords. Now I am wondering if it is sufficient for the
use. Is
there either a foxpro (.prg) source that I can incorporate into my
log on
program or binary that I can load into memory? This is for my alarm
company dispatch center, so i have a responsibility to be secure.
John
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
