Not a silly question.

Some background: We have to archive documents for various lengths of time. For 
a murder case, it's basically forever.  When searching for a file from 2007, 
the file wasn't valid. Not a problem in this case in that they still had the 
hard copy of the file so they re-scanned it.  I wasn't involved with the 
research of this file, but let's just imagine that the file existed but it was 
filled with garbage characters. (Worst case scenario.)

The way our offsite long-term backup system works, is that they will keep 
versions of a file that have changed in the last 30 days. After that, they 
start removing older files until the most current file is 30 days old and they 
will keep that forever.  BUT, what if that current file is corrupted, and the 
older files were valid?  It'd be better to know earlier than later.

Why wouldn't a file be valid? 
* Zero bytes long
* Mis constructed header
* Garbage filled file
* Truncated file
* Other file format saved with wrong extension
... more

Thanks everyone for their feedback!

-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Davis
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Common File Document Validation

Might be a silly question but if you found a file which wasn't valid, what you 
going to do?

Why wouldn't a file be valid?  

This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and
(i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message
immediately if this is an electronic communication.

Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/f82db4de49440845a14b540f6c2df6a91be...@blufitspmbs01.cherokeega.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to