On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, at 12:29 AM, Ken McGinnis wrote:
>  Is there something like that for python? Maybe the DBI controls would work 
> with python?
> 
> 

Controls like that can be leveraged by creating a Python wrapper for
them and PyWin32, then tying you into the Windows platform of course. Is
there something like that for Python? Python is a general purpose,
cross-platform language that doesn't have its own native UI. So you bolt
on a UI toolkit like PyQt or something, and the question then becomes
whether there is a calendar\schedule for your chosen toolkit. For PyQt
there would be for example: 

http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/PyQt4/qcalendarwidget.html#details
 

-- 
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, at 12:29 AM, Ken McGinnis wrote:
> Ted,
> 
> That is interesting. I can see where Dabo would be able to replace VFP. 
> For many years I have used some DBI ocx controls for scheduling, and a 
> few other functions. I like the way that DBI works and I was not able to 
> make VFP code that would do the same things as nicely as DBI does it. Is 
> there something like that for python? Maybe the DBI controls would work 
> with python?
> 
> 
> On 9/11/2016 7:56 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Laurie Alvey <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> haven't looked at Dabo, but doesn't Python mean web based apps? Can it do
> >> desktop?
> >>
> > Take two minutes to skim http://www.dabodev.com/
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to