Ted, Running on the server itself or on terminals using the server with VFP tables?
We have 8 x 2012 VM's running on one physical server using HyperV and 4 of them run VFP apps either locally or on Win 7 64bit clients with no problems at all. Check if the VM's are Dynamically allocated or are they pre-partitioned and allocated. When VFP is extending tables in a Dynamic VM it tends to work a LOT slower. We made sure all our VM's were allocated at creation time as contiguous data areas. Dave -----Original Message----- From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: 17 November 2016 16:21 To: [email protected] Subject: Guess the problem? VFP9, HyperV, 2012R2 A former client from way back when emailed me with a brief question on "running VFP 9 on a server with HyperV and Windows Server 2012R2." They are migrating an existing app from Server 2003 and he says on the new machine, "it runs like a dog" and I'm guessing he doesn't mean greyhound. With this lack of clues, has anyone got a shot-in-the-dark guess what might be going wrong? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
