I guess that the requirement for 11 levels must be due to multiple variations 
of the same class being required depending upon the specification of the class 
environment. 

This would be better served using a class factory. That way the classes could 
be discrete and easily maintained.

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fernando D. Bozzo
Sent: 10 April 2017 11:51
To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Retrospective properties - the magic of inheritance

In my experience, that's bad design.

If you need geniuses to modify that, then that's mean that it's not intended to 
be maintained by someone else, so expect a high cost of maintenance, and pray 
that those devs don't let you down.


El 10/4/2017 12:14, "Peter Cushing" <[email protected]> escribió:

>
> On 08/04/2017 00:50, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> I've always tried to never go more than 3 deep.  My corporate gig has 
>> me digging 11+ levels at times.  Needless to say, it's an "Excedrin moment"
>> when I have to debug that.  The developers are of a genius 
>> level--really, so GREAT minds--but I don't like the complexity cost.  
>> I'd rather slightly less than lightspeed performance if it means easier code 
>> maintenance.
>>
> If you have to go up to 11 levels deep in classes I can't see you 
> getting light speed performance.  I could be wrong but have heard of 
> other apps heavily subclassed having speed problems.  That would mean 
> you have an app that is hard to debug and not that fast.
>
> I have classes (toolbars and other controls) that are on several forms so
> I can re-use the functionality, but 11 levels deep?   What could possibly
> be that complex?
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom 
> it is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law.
> Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. 
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us 
> immediately by telephone or email.
> www.whisperingsmith.com
>
> Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR.
> Tel:0161 831 3700 Fax:0161 831 3715
> London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_junzk8p3krcm01w2rtoy84wzsyjugkprpqktgowp1wt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to