Ok, here's the information I get with SQLite3, the Dates are stored with 9 characters.
database page size: 4096 write format: 2 read format: 2 reserved bytes: 0 file change counter: 347 database page count: 532 freelist page count: 0 schema cookie: 45 schema format: 4 default cache size: 0 autovacuum top root: 39 incremental vacuum: 1 text encoding: 1 (utf8) user version: 0 application id: 0 software version: 3014000 number of tables: 23 number of indexes: 14 number of triggers: 0 number of views: 0 schema size: 8265 Subject: Re: Reading from SQLite Message-ID: <CACW6n4sokfifY57-mWO4ZGW1wv=o_j0mnkk5dxmmjwekryh...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Jos? Olavo Cer?volo <jocerav...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Ted, > The dates on the existing table are not .NULL..When I get the date using what > you suggested, datetime(yourfield,'unixepoch','localtime'), I get this date > on an MEMO field 1984-10-05 23:00:00. This date is not the actual date on the > other application. The date should be in 2017.The actual value stored on the > actual SQLite table is 459316800. Well, that's weird. THE SQLite function datetime() is expecting a number of 10 digits, so that's not the encoding scheme. Can you use a tool like SQLite3 to look at the actual data in the SQLite table and confirm this isn't a problem with ODBC or Fox's intepretation of the data? José Olavo Cerávolohttp://www.ceravoloconsulting.com/ --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/223834927.12808894.1493318212...@mail.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
