At 14:27 2017-05-10, Fred Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
It actually runs. Scary, huh!
Very.
It means that a WITH block has execution scope, not lexical scope.
It might be why some people have trouble with WITH.
Suppose a caller has one or more WITH blocks open and calls a
method. If the called method uses WITH, the object references are
not going to be what is expected. There is nothing the called method
can do about it and still use WITH.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/92f3d520fb872f623bb1e9090afc2772@mtlp000086
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
