At 05:14 2017-06-07, Stephen Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 21:28 2017-06-06, [email protected] wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
>> set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would have
>> NEVER been tolerated in a desktop app.
> <sarcasm style="dripping">But Web app UX has been improving
> oh-so-much-more than desktop apps for some time now.</sarcasm>
For some reason, you see UX like a painter who's medium is oil based. When
presented water colors you do not know how to express your craft with the
tools and call them inferior because of it.
Nope, because I do not do much Web programming. I am an end
user for the most part with Webpages.
I see plenty of Webpages that have been (mis)designed by others
that are a horror to use. I do not like the poor UX.
In the end, both mediums can be crafted and form great pieces of art. The
petty bickering between the artist gets redundant after a while.
While Webpages can be great, etc., they all too often not only
are not great but are horrid.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/54cc61e05e4fd8376558018468078037@mtlp000083
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
