Final report
So even though there were only 40 people logged in, 20 of those people had the 
program open twice.   This exposed bugs that were there all along.    Also 
there were too many indexes.  These were set up to make it blazingly fast for 
the user, but the updates were taking too long because of that, causing the 
'record not available" error.   
This system now should be able to handle hundreds of users. 
Thank you to everyone who offered suggestions.  
      From: Michael Madigan <[email protected]>
 To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 12:40 AM
 Subject: Re: "Record is not available" error in FPW 2.6
   
We've checked that, thank you. 

      From: Man-wai Chang <[email protected]>
 To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 7:24 AM
 Subject: Re: "Record is not available" error in FPW 2.6
  
Tell him to set the virus/malware scanner to exclude Foxpro data
files, or maybe the whole folder containing them. See if the problem
went away...

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Michael Madigan <[email protected]> wrote:
> The IT guy says no.
>
>  From: Man-wai Chang <[email protected]>
> >
> > Virus scanner at the server?

-- 
 .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to