Aha! The old reply vs. reply list problem.
On 06/13/2017 12:52 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote: > Pete - FYI - I DID see your reply last night - the original one. But, I saw > that in my personal home email. Here at work today - will admit I did NOT see > that reply. So - who knows - maybe you mistakenly ONLY wrote your reply to me > instead of to the list. And, I actually just now checked on my Cell Ph - and > that is truly the case - your original reply you ONLY sent to me. > > As for your actual comment - maybe anything you said in the Past was always > OT - but, this time around - you properly stuck to the topic! Good job!!! > :-) > > Regards, > Kurt Wendt > Senior Systems Analyst > > > Tel. +1-212-747-9100 > www.GlobeTax.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pete > Theisen > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 6:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [NF] Do you prefer Digest Mode? > > Well, I replied to this 8 hours ago, but my reply didn't make it. > > I said that "anything I say is considered [OT]". I didn't think that was > offensive but . . . > > Maybe the list has a filter that stops anything with [OT] in the body text, > or something. It ain't easy being green . . . -- Regards, Pete https://www.facebook.com/pete.theisen.5 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
