On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Man-wai Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > So it's about the algorithm. Well, then we need to find out why we > could trust those tools. If we figured out the algorithm, then we > might write a simple script to do the same process. The focus should > be 'how', NOT 'who' nor 'which'! ;)
As far as I know, scrub implements _published_ standards of NIST and DOD. And the source is open source and available for your inspection. That _is_ the simple script of which you write. > Unless... unless... the algorithm is patented and/or copyrighted? Meow... Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4ukkmepbwlxriewvetw5gi_bf4gvobuu+3bwx+ot_-...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
