It always seems to me that using a naming convention on a table was
redundant at best because every table is a table. 

However, if you are doing a large project with a lot of tables, using a
prefix can help you group similar tables together. For example, if you are
building a complete accounting system it can be helpful to start all
Accounts Receivable tables with "AR_" or Accounts Payable tables with "AP_",
but it makes no sense whatsoever to prefix each table with "tbl" or worse,
start each field with "fld". 

Paul H. Tarver
Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.
Email: [email protected] 



-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen
Russell
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 8:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NF] back to naming conventions

I just got a custom Access application that our product development team
contracted out.

Every table in the damn mdf file starts with tbl

Just letting you know that fox doesn't own the <stupid> idea that type has
to be baked into everything.

--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to