Maybe I'm just not "meta" enough, but as cool and useful as inheritance is, more than just a few levels deep makes my head swim. And, the older I get, the more I seem to be leaving breadcrumbs behind for me a follow a few years from now when I have to do updates.
Now that I think about it, I think I'm going to start leaving myself motivational statements in my comments. That way when I revisit code in the future, it will be like my younger self cheering on my older self. Of course, if I start seeing messages from my older self in code I'm working on currently, I should probably seek help immediately. Right? :) Paul -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 4:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Checkbox Problem On 2017-10-24 15:34, Paul H. Tarver wrote: > I use Valid and LostFocus far more frequently than InteractiveChange. > When I > do use InteractiveChange it is usually to activate/deactivate other > form fields based on this.value. > Usually no more than 2 or 3 lines of code at the most if I can help it > and never while in a grid. > The crazy code I had at the last gig was doing that crap in a grid. Ugh. So buggy. It didn't help that you had to debug maybe 13+ levels on stack due to gazillion layers on inheritance. [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
