> Why would we want to do that? It isn't the language that makes Fox > special; it the ability to crunch large amounts of data efficiently. > That's what we are making sure that Dabo can do.
By not keeping Foxpro alive, all of us would not need to climb the learning curve to master new syntax+semantics. Our brain size is limited. Does the English langauge itself changes so dramatically as a tool over 10 years like computer languages? -- .~. http://changmw.homeip.net / v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.18.2 /( _ )\ (Ubuntu 6.10) 20:11:01 up 4 days 38 min ^ ^ 0 users load average: 1.00 1.00 1.00 news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
