I have some indexes larger than your last hard drive. :) Table Name # Records Reserved (KB) Data (KB) Indexes (KB) Unused (KB) dbo.ttfgld495600 95,953,505 251,547,152 138,105,072 111,772,128 1,669,952
dbo.ttfgld482600 105,142,512 146,331,720 100,144,320 45,854,776 332,624 dbo.ttfgld465600 100,724,986 135,428,712 134,551,896 859,840 16,976 dbo.ttfgld106600 85,175,413 78,139,496 46,399,096 31,710,944 29,456 On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Kurt at VR-FX <[email protected]> wrote: > Forgive Stephen - as he now plays with the Big Boys like M$ SQL! > > :-) > > -K- > > > On 1/24/2018 5:53 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> On 2018-01-24 15:19, Stephen Russell wrote: >> >>> I expect the update of .cdx to be at the same time that the .dbf is done. >>> >>> 223 meg is a tiny index size and reducing it down to 1/4 probably didn't >>> make anything faster, did it? Now an index of 20 gig that would >>> probably >>> be noticed if you brought it in line to only 5 gig. >>> >> >> >> VFP files can't be more than 2 GB, Stephen. >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYK23Q67NDjwxQ+niaZrc7P0QdrwrDuxtAd=tkztasn...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
