I don't feel bad about it, really, but this makes clear that the Author of
the article probably never did work with this languages and didn't work
maintaining any systems developed in those now zombie languages.

I think that those stats have much sense if you think that there is too
much code working in production and that all this situations can justify
this reborn on TIOBE:

- You have to maintain a legacy system (VB in this case) and you need to
search some info about language functionality or parameters, what do you
do? If you have not installed the MSDN on your disk, then you search it on
Google

- The same applies to old ASP pages with VBscript. You probably search for
VBscript or VB6

- You need to search some examples about COM functionality (COM components,
Soap, XML, WMI, etc) used from an old Windows language, what do you do? you
search it on Google, and probably you search for a VB6 example even if you
are interested in VFP or other language. Why? because VB6 have always been
the Microsoft preference in last century, and most examples are done using
VB6. I did search the other day for a VB6 example if something that I want
to call from VFP!

And the same applies to any COM compatible  language. It's easier to find
something for VB6 than for anything else.

Fernando D. Bozzo


El 15 feb. 2018 16:21, "Paul H. Tarver" <[email protected]> escribió:

> Did anyone catch this article about "Zombie Languages"?
>
>
>
> https://www.techrepublic.com/article/zombie-programming-
> languages-could-visu
> al-basic-be-the-next-cobol/?ftag=TRE684d531
> <https://www.techrepublic.com/article/zombie-programming-
> languages-could-vis
> ual-basic-be-the-next-cobol/?ftag=TRE684d531&bhid=
> 19995525687222274123473679
> 288983> &bhid=19995525687222274123473679288983
>
>
>
> While the article focuses on Visual Basic, I think VFP qualifies under
> their
> definition:
>
>
>
> Zombie Languages: "Those old developer favorites that refuse to die"
>
>
>
> To be honest, it makes all of us FoxPro coders cool again: We are all
> "Zombie Wranglers!"
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~ Pull Quote ~~~~~~~
>
> James Milligan also drew parallels with the perennial demand for
> programmers
> skilled in venerable mainframe programming language COBOL, a language older
> than The Beatles.
>
>
>
> "Other languages which continue to be widely used despite running legacy
> systems include COBOL. It's known that COBOL tends to be preferred in
> business, finance and administrative systems due to its efficiency in
> handling large volumes of data - so it's predicted to remain popular across
> these sectors."
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGQ_JukqSzbgrR=1-kypf5me4itbeb2q+fcxrrwhsf9gmb-...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to