I didn't test it and didn't use it in many years, but could be possible that the table had a file lock (not record lock) by this another user?
Don't know if the message is the same or something more like "table header is locked by another user" El vie., 16 mar. 2018 4:30, <[email protected]> escribió: > On 2018-03-15 21:15, Richard Kaye wrote: > > INSERT INTO has to be doing an implicit USE, don't you think? > > > I can't tell if the table was open, and if not, your logic is > reasonable, but if it WAS already open, ???? > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_jumnkq84-pgaw7cf5azrmaj6jptrnbpcetbn3z38b8e...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
