On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Fernando D. Bozzo <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that a CMS could be an option

ION, everything on the internet is a CMS ;)

Not to disagree with you, Fernando, but just to ask if you had a
specific product in mind.

A CMS primarily designed for chronological journal entries is a blog,
A CMS primarily focused on managing a web of editable information is a wiki
A CMS primarily focused on managing uploaded documents and their
changes is a document management system.

And many products combine these things, as in some sense, these are
just different views of the same data, as browse and edit screens are
two views into the same data.

One of my faves for development use is RedMine (https://redmine.org/).
It has a wiki, a document upload/download, a bug tracker and links
directly to your source control provider of choice (SVN, CVS, Git,
Mercurial and Bazaar) as long as that choice isn't MSFT. It lets you
set up multiple projects and limit access to projects by login
account. Best of all, it comes in an easy-to-use Ruby environment!
(Highly recommend you find a VM image to run if you're not a Ruby
goo-roo.)

Really, any basic wiki will do, given the general question and lack of
specific needs. You can shop at cmsmatrix.org  and be overwhelmed by
too many choices, or start with your chosen platform and language and
narrow it down to a few.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4t4nqdzajpipvnaoc4gphowwse6d_vq2-zqxyrohge...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to