Helio W. wrote:
> Beheading is evilness but firing a missile on a civilian crowd is OK?
> 
> On 11/26/06, Michael Oke, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>> Though you agree with me in this one we do so on different grounds. I'd
>>> like to express my view..
>>>
>>> "What, but a SAVAGE, beheads people?"
>>> I can see a beheading is impressive to those who see it. But on accounts
>>> of what I've seen about death penalties (gas chamber, electric chair),
>>> though I will admit only through tv. I would prefer to be beheaded every
>>> time. Less pain, faster.
>>>
>> You are now comparing the sentence for a crime, and, at least in
>> America, one that will have been dragged out for countless years, to an
>> act committed against those who are innocent.  Perhaps beheading would
>> be a more 'humane' method of carrying out a death sentence but, having
>> not been beheaded, I'll refrain from commenting, at least at the present
>> time.
> 

I thought he was talking about beheading as a sentence. If you talk
about beheading of invading forces soldiers, considering they haven't
signed Geneva and wouldn't be protected by it then it is a merciful way
of killing an enemy. If you talk about the beheading of civilians who
work for the invading forces, well, the Iraqis have no uniform and so no
reason to appreciate any difference between both kinds of enemy
(civilian or military). As for killing other people, yes, I find it
reproachable. But just as reproachable as what you would call
'collateral damage' (and I mean BOTH are reproachable).


> 
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to