Paul,
I tried to use 3050 back a few years ago i.e:

* =SYS(3050, 1, MIN(536870912, VAL(SYS(3050, 1, 0)))) && Foreground Buffers
* =SYS(3050, 2, MIN(536870912, VAL(SYS(3050, 1, 0)))) && Background Buffers
* =Sys(1104) && Purge Cached Memory
Or
* Normally the Buffers are dynamically allocated by default
* But to allocate manually, do:
*=Sys(3050,1, 256000000)                && Set to 256Mb Foreground
*=Sys(3050,2, 256000000)                && Set to 256Mb Background

But neither approach worked in Win 7 64 bit. But it did in 32 bit. 

I used to get c5 errors constantly, but I must admit I haven't tried it in 
Windows 10.

Dave Crozier
Software Development Manager
Flexipol Packaging Ltd.

-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Paul Newton
Sent: 09 August 2018 10:43
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Subject: Error 1150 - Not enough memory for file map

Hi all

We have had a few incidents where this error has arisen and googling suggests 
using Sys(3050 ...) to set the foreground and background buffer size.  However 
I have also seen a suggestion to add the following:
BBMS=512;FBMS=512
to the command line that runs the executable.  Has anybody come across this - I 
tried google but came up with nothing.

Many thanks
Paul Newton


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/mm1p123mb0953ac4e6498162045f895b1fb...@mm1p123mb0953.gbrp123.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to