Of course I've understood your question, just trying to point out that it's no longer a concern since keeping VFP is no longer a risk and rewrite brings no additional value.

As far as I know, all clone languages (Lianja, x#, xBase++) require changing the VFP code; as soon as you change a single line of your app in a non back compat manner, it becomes a migration where you can't safely step back; and here come the risks and costs.

Thierry Nivelet

Le 14/03/2019 à 17:45, Fletcher Johnson a écrit :

Thierry,

All I know is that there have been a number of comments about various options 
that are similar to VFP that have come out (X# is one) where VFP code will more 
or less run, especially with some of the built in conversion tools.

So the question isn't whether to stay with VFP, but if there are any 
alternatives that will run the VFP code without significant re-writes.

Thanks,

Fletcher


Fletcher Johnson
[email protected]
LinkedIn.com/in/FletcherJohnson
twitter.com/fletcherJ
strava.com/athletes/fletcherjohnson
408-946-0960 - work
408-781-2345 - cell


-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thierry Nivelet
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 3:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NF] Looking for current summary of VFP clones

Hi Fletscher,

Does your client really knows that, since 10 is the last version of Windows, 
VFP will work as long as Windows 10 will work, and re-write and/or migration 
will bring nothing but cost and risk without a single benefit (except for those 
who rewrite): learning, moving data to SQL if not already, rewriting, testing, 
retraining users, managing the transition with part of the app in VFP and part 
in the new system (no new app ever work overnight), etc., maybe loss of 
functionalities, and risk that the transition works out badly…

Seeking alternatives to FoxPro was valid until Microsoft announced that Windows 
10 was the last version (in may 2015, almost 4 years ago), today it's just 
seeking cost and risk for no other benefit than 'doing someting new'.

VFP is incredibly reliable; some FoxInCloud clients have FoxInCloud web apps 
with over 50 forms (could be more), 50 concurrent users (could be more), 
PostgreSQL database, 8 logical servers in parallel (stateless, many-to-many 
relation between users and servers), running full weeks without a single error 
(100% availability) while reading and writing thousands of files, tables, 
memos, indexes and so forth. The busiest server runs 25k user requests per day, 
that we can estimate over 1.2 billion VFP instructions, without a single error…

Bringing additional value to the existing VFP app is probably more worthy and 
interesting than rewriting; eg. with FoxInCloud.

(I know I don't really answer your original question, just trying to open new 
pathes).

Thierry Nivelet
FoxInCloud

Le 13/03/2019 à 16:45, Fletcher Johnson a écrit :
Hi all,

I was asked for a list of current options for someone who has a VFP
application and wants to migrate it to a supported language, with the least
amount of re-work.

I have seen many options listed, but am sure how compatible the various
alternatives are.  X# looks promising, but so do some of the others.  And
some that I thought were good options now appear to be dormant or
discontinued.  So I thought I would check with you fine folks to see if you
know where I might find a list of current alternatives and their level of
compatibility.

Thanks,

Fletcher

Fletcher Johnson

   <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

   <http://linkedin.com/in/FletcherJohnson> LinkedIn.com/in/FletcherJohnson

twitter.com/fletcherJ

   <https://www.strava.com/athletes/fletcherjohnson>
strava.com/athletes/fletcherjohnson

408-946-0960 - work

408-781-2345 - cell



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
    text/plain (text body -- kept)
    text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to