"So what are these deals really buying Microsoft? Some might say, as 
Ballmer did at the Novell press conference, it is just listening to what 
customers want. But there is an old curmudgeonly reporter in me who sees 
something else.

Despite promises of interoperability, Microsoft does not disclose the 
technical linkages between its desktop products such as Office and the 
server-side products such as e-mail. You need these disclosures for full 
interoperability. Although the spin promises interoperability, with 
Apple, Sun, and Novell, I wonder if it isn’t a brilliant ploy to ensure 
that IT will get locked in to using Microsoft products. Take the latest 
deal with Novell. Novell in essence has done nothing less than validate 
the Microsoft path. Microsoft now has a Linux solution coupled to 
Microsoft, adding legitimacy and the Linux cachet to Windows.

Further, the cynic in me says that through virtualization, Microsoft 
will surround Linux so that Linux will run as a guest on a Windows 
platform, with Windows underneath. In time, Microsoft might improve the 
function and performance on the Windows side, but Linux will somehow get 
disadvantaged. Then, says the Microsoft salesperson, “You are already 
running Windows. Why don’t you use Windows up and down the stack? It 
works better anyway.”

Five or 10 years from now as Microsoft continues this strategy, IT will 
wake up and discover it is not the heterogeneous shop it thought it was. 
And I wonder: If that happens, will we ever get the full benefits of 
innovation and competitive pricing?"

<http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/11/21/48OPreality_1.html>



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to