I remember following someone on Twitter (this was several years ago....) who got upset with something JVP tweeted to her. Ya know, the normal JVP stuff, only 140 characters.
Unfortunately he messed with the wrong person. She let others know about it on Twitter. And these people dredged up old tweets. And they called his employer to let them know about these old tweets and the current brouhaha since his employer was in his profile. It was fun to watch for a while. Bill Anderson On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:58 AM Richard Kaye <[email protected]> wrote: > <roflmao> > > -- > > rk > > -----Original Message----- > From: ProfoxTech <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 11:55 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: The JVP line still exists after all these years > > On Nov 15, 2019, at 10:52 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > I laugh when I read the footer: "** All postings, unless explicitly > stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute > legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those > lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious." > > Why would you associate that with JVP??? > > <blinks innocently> > > > -- Ed Leafe > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ca+o1engbenogmcxyg4thje1sclbh-tc6yg+qfqgqva15amt...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
