I can't recall if what was patched in that VFP "10" also addressed things
like max array sizes, max text strings, size of 'index data' loaded into
memory, etc. In general, things might just simply run faster (under the
hood stuff of running 32-bit on 64-bit). And maybe the 'modern' ODBC
drivers (64-bit) can now be used? <shrug>

Probably the best answer would be to try to recompile an app into VFP 10
and do some speed/timing tests (like anyone has time for that.... heh).

-Charlie

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:32 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
[email protected]> wrote:

> (And let's face it...we VFP devs need all the marketing hype we can get
> if we're still pushing our apps.  lol)
>
>
> On 4/16/2020 11:28 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
> > I finally I downloaded the VFPA runtime files and am going to use that
> > IDE and develop/deploy with this "VFP 10" version since many here have
> > spoken of it without much negativity.
> >
> > Question:  what would be the benefit of using the 64-bit version IF
> > I'M NOT USING DBFS (because in my MBSS apps, I use MariaDB/MySQL as
> > the backend, not VFP).  I just don't see the benefit other than for
> > marketing my apps to say "they're 64-bit using the VC++ 10 runtimes."
> >
> > tia,
> > --Mike
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/cajgvlx1vm9afya8rtkcuubronji5d7-upuew3acvwxawfn3...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to