And it looks like Cathy covered this in the Making Sense of Sedna book; clues 
discovered by following the advice of Ted “Did you do your homework here before 
you asked your question here?” Roche. 😊 

--

rk

From: ProfoxTech <profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 1:46 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Report page number resets by group using page x of y expression

I know I've seen this before. You might search the Profox archives for
_pagetotal. I seem to recall a problem with runtimes/hotfixes not
applied that would cause _pagetotal to misbehave.

On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 12:47 PM Richard Kaye <mailto:rk...@invaluable.com> 
wrote:
>
> The plot thickens. I tweaked my data set so that the one page group at the 
> beginning went away, and I allocated those records to a group in the middle 
> of the data set. That group now runs to 3 pages but the _pagetotal system var 
> still shows 2 so I get the mathematically incorrect Page 3 of 2 for that 
> group. So I'm guessing I can't really do this if I want to rely on _pageno 
> and _pagetotal... (Paging Cathy Poutney... <grin>)
>
> --
>
> rk
> From: ProfoxTech <mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Richard 
> Kaye
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 12:39 PM
> To: mailto:profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Report page number resets by group using page x of y expression
>
> ProFoxers,
>
> I have a report. It has 2 groups and I'm using a page x of y object in the 
> page footer. I want the page numbers to reset on the outer group. I've set 
> the appropriate setting in that group. With the particular data set I am 
> testing with, the first group only has one page worth of data. All the rest 
> of the groups have up to 2 pages of data. However, the x of y object shows 1 
> of 2 for the first group and I'm expecting 1 of 1. As I continue to poke at 
> this I figured why not throw out an actual VFP question to the collective 
> wisdom.
>
> Happy Friday!
>
> --
>
> rk
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: mailto:ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: 
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/rTsECzpBE7uvZxAso0ass?domain=mail.leafe.com
OT-free version of this list: 
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/rEH3CADQ2MIMXnzsMpXXC?domain=mail.leafe.com
Searchable Archive: 
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/EVKnCBB82Pu3rMOhv_ewn?domain=leafe.com
This message: 
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/VhYpCDkY2QSQznkhBv9tZ?domain=leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/byapr10mb33987d32217163b98655d72bd2...@byapr10mb3398.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to