Looks about the same:
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
dkim=fail [email protected] header.s=mail header.b=n1Hgn9+3;
dkim=fail [email protected] header.s=mail header.b=OPglFyhm;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) [email protected]
header.s=mail header.b=ZqWTtt2G;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected]
designates 209.97.148.170 as permitted sender)
On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 4:56 PM Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2024, at 15:16, Ted Roche <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
> > dkim=fail [email protected] header.s=mail header.b=Os6SioDN;
> > dkim=fail [email protected] header.s=mail header.b=md9xnSO+;
> > dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) [email protected]
>
> Wonder if I need to switch DKIM to use `leafe.com <http://leafe.com/>`
> instead of `mail.leafe.com <http://mail.leafe.com/>`? I've just done
> that, so let's see how this message does.
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message:
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CACW6n4ve8PRCEzyEHvfp019KbFrTvcRuF+EZi=7vyhtbfoz...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
