Pete Theisen wrote: > On Wednesday 06 December 2006 18:30, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >> Pete Theisen wrote: >>> On Tuesday 05 December 2006 20:39, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >>>> Pete Theisen wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:58, Jean Laeremans wrote: >>>>>> On 11/28/06, Virgil Bierschwale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> Global warming a theory ? >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/recenttc.html >>>>> Hi Jean! >>>>> >>>>> Right on cue. Just when we are freezing our butts off here with an >>>>> early chill someone tosses "global warming" into the discussion. Yeah, >>>>> sure. >>>> I wish science was as simple as the stories you tell yourself about it. >>>> Then I might have kept studying. Sadly things are not so simple. >>> Hi Ricardo! >>> >>> I did keep studying. As a matter of fact, things are that simple - when >>> you have studied enough. >> And still you don't take the time to read properly. I said : "Then 'I' >> might have kept studying". Here it conveys that the person who's talking >> (that is me, not you) did not keep studying. > > Hi Ricardo! > > My point wasn't about studying or not, but rather about simple or not. Had > you > studied long enough you would hit the spot where you would have said (heel of > hand to forehead) "Hey! This is actually quite simple!"
Yeah, I guess that's true about giving massage and about Chinese medicine (now THAT's a really simple one). _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
