Manjit Basra <> wrote:
> I sorry, I should have explained what I am trying to do. I use
> extensive VFP COM objects in my Web App. I have about 2500 users, who
> will need to access the system once a year. All of these users are
> already in LDAP. I don't need to keep them in my system. The app
> needs to know if he/she belongs to a specific group for security
> purpose.     
> 
> Manjit Basra
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Hal Kaplan 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:50 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: RE: LDAP Authentication from VFP
> 
> => Subject: RE: LDAP Authentication from VFP => => Hi everyone, =>
> => Has anyone tried to authenticate a user to Active Directory
> => through VFP. I found the following dot-net code that I would
> => like to convert: => => => 1)   Dim adPath as String =
> "LDAP://wssumits" =>
> => 2)   Dim adAuth as LdapAuthentication = new
> => LdapAuthentication(adPath)
> =>
> => 3)   ok = adAuth.IsAuthenticated("wssumits", txtUsername.Text,
> => txtPassword.Text)
> =>
> =>
> => I just don't understand how to convert line #2. Is this a
> => don-net class? Any help would be greatly appreciated. =>
> => Manjit Basra
> =>
> 
> I do not have an answer but I do have a question:
> 
> Why is it necessary to authenticate a user who obviously has
> sufficient credentials to execute the VFP program that is attempting
> to authenticate?  
> What additional information or utility will the authentication
> provide? 
> 
> TIA
> 
> B+
> HALinNY
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to