or I could have said it didn't look like HYPF was going anywhere anytime soon. <g>
Regards, LelandJ Leland Jackson wrote: >HyPower Fuel Inc., HYPF, is traded Over the Counter and is a penny >stock. It has been as high as .40 per share, and as low as .07 per >share this last year, but has traded mostly between ten to twenty cents >per share. I didn't see a buy, hold or sell rating on it, so I'm >guessing there is a still a lot of risk in the practicality of hydrogen >fuel energy. > >Regards, > >LelandJ > >Leland Jackson wrote: > > > >>I guess we would need to know what an H2 reactor was: >> >>#--------------------------- >>HyPower believes that its H2 Reactor’s electrolysis process is the most >>efficient to date with an unprecedented ratio of hydrogen production to >>electrical input. >>#-------------------------- >> >>Regards, >> >>LelandJ >> >> >>Michael Madigan wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Well the water is the fuel, so it's not really >>>perpetual motion. >>> >>>I just don't think you can generate enough hydrogen >>>quickly enough to burn in a internal combustion >>>engine. >>> >>> >>> >>>--- Leland Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I also have my doubts about using one source of >>>>energy to create >>>>another. Physics indicates there can be no way to >>>>transfer energy in a >>>>way that create a perpetual self sustaining source >>>>of energy. Because of >>>>inefficiencies, something energy will always be >>>>wasted or lost. But then >>>>again, consider the wind, which is free, >>>>non-depletable and near >>>>perpetual. Perhaps some day we will learn to ride >>>>the wind, like the >>>>dragon. <g> >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>> >>>>LelandJ >>>> >>>> >>>>Michael Madigan wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Gee I'm not sure about this one. It seems to me it >>>>>would take a lot more power to crack the water >>>>>molecules into hydrogen and oxygen, and take too >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>long >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>to do it. I don't see how you could generate >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>hydrogen >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>fast enough to run the car. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>--- Leland Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Interesting. Click on link below for the full >>>>>>article. >>>>>> >>>>>>Excerpt: >>>>>>#-------------------------- >>>>>>“This is an extremely significant advance in that >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>a >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>vehicle with a >>>>>>standard internal combustion engine can be powered >>>>>>with hydrogen >>>>>>produced onboard as needed. Other hydrogen >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>vehicles >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>require special >>>>>>storage tanks to supply the highly compressed gas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>to >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>the engine. This is >>>>>>not yet a practical application as there are >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>simply >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>very few available >>>>>>refueling stations for these vehicles,” said Mr. >>>>>>Doug Bender, President >>>>>>of HyPower. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2006/12/12/031280.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>or >>>>>> >>>>>>http://tinyurl.com/yhb56g >>>>>>#------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>>LelandJ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>>Post Messages to: [email protected] >>>>>>Subscription Maintenance: >>>>>>http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox >>>>>>OT-free version of this list: >>>>>>http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech >>>>>>** All postings, unless explicitly stated >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>otherwise, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>are the opinions of the author, and do not >>>>>>constitute legal or medical advice. This statement >>>>>>is added to the messages for those lawyers who are >>>>>>too stupid to see the obvious. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>Christmas gifts for Real Americans >>>>>Free Shipping for orders over $50 >>>>>http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
